Lilly v. United States
This text of 22 F. App'x 293 (Lilly v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Sara Elizabeth Lilly appeals from the district court’s order granting the United States’ motion to dismiss, under Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), her complaint filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1346(b) (West Supp.2001), 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 2671-2680 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the parties’ briefs, the joint appendix, and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Ac *294 cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lilly v. United States, No. CA-00-1006-2 (S.D.W.Va. May 11, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 F. App'x 293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lilly-v-united-states-ca4-2001.