Lilly v. . Smith

154 S.E. 742, 199 N.C. 809, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 270
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 1, 1930·Published

Opinion

Peb CubiaM.

The issues submitted are not accordant with the theory upon which the case was tried, but as the result agrees with the theory of the trial and involves only a question of fact, it would apparently serve no useful purpose to remand the cause for another hearing. Pate v. Gaitley, 183 N. C., 262, 111 S. E., 339.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lilly v. . Smith, 154 S.E. 742, 199 N.C. 809, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 270 (N.C. 1930).

154 S.E. 742 (Lilly v. . Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pate v. . Gaitley
111 S.E. 339 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1922)