Lilly v. Schwartz
This text of Lilly v. Schwartz (Lilly v. Schwartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
__________________________________________ ) CARL S. LILLY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 09-2153 (PLF) ) MAJOR GENERAL ERROL R. SCHWARTZ, ) Commander, District of Columbia ) National Guard, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________)
ORDER
For the reasons stated in an Opinion filed under seal, with a redacted version filed
on the public docket, and issued this same day, it is hereby
ORDERED that defendant’s motion for summary judgment [8] is GRANTED and
judgment is entered for the defendant on all claims; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for a declaratory judgment [16] is
DENIED and defendant’s motion to stay discovery [17] is DENIED as moot; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall remove this case from
the docket of this Court. This is a final appealable order. See FED . R. APP . P. 4(a).
SO ORDERED.
_/s/__________________________ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN United States District Judge DATE: May 21, 2010
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lilly v. Schwartz, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lilly-v-schwartz-dcd-2010.