Lilly Dache, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Lilly Dache, Inc. v. United States

37 Cust. Ct. 407

United States Customs Court·Decided November 8, 1956·No. No. 60329; protests 211682-K and 211683-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fur hoods the same in all material respects as those passed upon in United States v. Accurate Millinery Co., Roberts, Reilly & Sons, et al. (42 C. C. P. A. 229, C. A. D. 599), the claims of the plaintiff were sustained as follows: (1) The items marked “A,” consisting of hoods, valued at more than $12 and not more than $15 per dozen, were held dutiable at 47)4 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1526 (a), as modified, supra, and (2) the items marked “B,” [408]*408consisting of hoods, valued at more than $18 and not more than $24 per dozen, were held dutiable at 40 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1526 (a), as modified, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fur hoods the same in all material respects as those passed upon in United States v. Accurate Millinery Co., Roberts, Reilly & Sons, et al. (42 C. C. P. A. 229, C. A. D. 599), the claims of the plaintiff were sustained as follows: (1) The items marked “A,” consisting of hoods, valued at more than $12 and not more than $15 per dozen, were held dutiable at 47)4 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1526 (a), as modified, supra, and (2) the items marked “B,” [408]*408consisting of hoods, valued at more than $18 and not more than $24 per dozen, were held dutiable at 40 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1526 (a), as modified, supra.

Lilly Dache, Inc. v. United States, 37 Cust. Ct. 407 (cusc 1956).

Pincite

37 Cust. Ct. 407 (Lilly Dache, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.