Lilly & Bro. v. Purcell

78 N.C. 82
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 5, 1878
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 78 N.C. 82 (Lilly & Bro. v. Purcell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lilly & Bro. v. Purcell, 78 N.C. 82 (N.C. 1878).

Opinion

Faircloth, J.

The plaintiff', a citizen of New Hanover County, brought this action before a Justice of the Peace in said County, against the defendant, a citizen of Robeson County, by sending process to the latter County, as provided by statute in certain cases. Did the Justice have jurisdiction ?

In Wooten v. Maultsby, 69 N. C, 462, it is said there was no such jurisdiction; but that was not the main question involved in that case, and it was probably not discussed. In *83 Sossamer v. Hinson, 72 N. C. 578, it was held that the Justice Nad jurisdiction under a proper construction of Bat. Rev. ch. 63 § 50, and so the law continued until the Act of 1876-’77, ch. 287, ratified March 12th, 1877, after the present action was commenced; which Act in explicit terms takes away jurisdiction in a case like the present. Let judgment be entered here for the plaintiff according to the judgment below.

No error.

FeR CuRIAm. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dixon v. . Haar
74 S.E. 1 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1912)
Austin v. J. W. Lewis & Co.
72 S.E. 493 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1911)
Rutherford v. . Ray
61 S.E. 57 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1908)
Durham Fertilizer Co. v. Marshburn
29 S.E. 411 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 N.C. 82, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lilly-bro-v-purcell-nc-1878.