Lilly & Bro. v. Purcell

78 N.C. 82
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 5, 1878·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Faircloth, J.

The plaintiff', a citizen of New Hanover County, brought this action before a Justice of the Peace in said County, against the defendant, a citizen of Robeson County, by sending process to the latter County, as provided by statute in certain cases. Did the Justice have jurisdiction ?

In Wooten v. Maultsby, 69 N. C, 462, it is said there was no such jurisdiction; but that was not the main question involved in that case, and it was probably not discussed. In *83 Sossamer v. Hinson, 72 N. C. 578, it was held that the Justice Nad jurisdiction under a proper construction of Bat. Rev. ch. 63 § 50, and so the law continued until the Act of 1876-’77, ch. 287, ratified March 12th, 1877, after the present action was commenced; which Act in explicit terms takes away jurisdiction in a case like the present. Let judgment be entered here for the plaintiff according to the judgment below.

No error.

FeR CuRIAm. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lilly & Bro. v. Purcell, 78 N.C. 82 (N.C. 1878).

78 N.C. 82 (Lilly & Bro. v. Purcell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dixon v. . Haar
74 S.E. 1 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1912)
Austin v. J. W. Lewis & Co.
72 S.E. 493 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1911)
Rutherford v. . Ray
61 S.E. 57 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1908)
Durham Fertilizer Co. v. Marshburn
29 S.E. 411 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1898)