Lilley v. Warren

651 F. App'x 195
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 1, 2016
DocketNo. 16-6423
StatusPublished

This text of 651 F. App'x 195 (Lilley v. Warren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lilley v. Warren, 651 F. App'x 195 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Chester Lambert Lilley, Jr., appeals the district court’s order and judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint for failing to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lilley v. Warren, No. 5:16-cv-00030-FDW (W.D.N.C. Mar. 10, 2016). We deny Libley’s motions for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Screening
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
651 F. App'x 195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lilley-v-warren-ca4-2016.