Lilley v. Warren

Fourth Circuit

Lilley v. Warren

651 F. App'x 195

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 1, 2016·No. No. 16-6423·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Chester Lambert Lilley, Jr., appeals the district court’s order and judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint for failing to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lilley v. Warren, No. 5:16-cv-00030-FDW (W.D.N.C. Mar. 10, 2016). We deny Libley’s motions for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Chester Lambert Lilley, Jr., appeals the district court’s order and judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint for failing to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lilley v. Warren, No. 5:16-cv-00030-FDW (W.D.N.C. Mar. 10, 2016). We deny Libley’s motions for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Lilley v. Warren, 651 F. App'x 195 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

651 F. App'x 195 (Lilley v. Warren) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related