Lilley v. Warren
This text of 651 F. App'x 195 (Lilley v. Warren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Chester Lambert Lilley, Jr., appeals the district court’s order and judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint for failing to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lilley v. Warren, No. 5:16-cv-00030-FDW (W.D.N.C. Mar. 10, 2016). We deny Libley’s motions for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
651 F. App'x 195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lilley-v-warren-ca4-2016.