Lilley v. Second Injury Fund

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lilley v. Second Injury Fund

243 S.W.3d 546, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 106, 2008 WL 170496

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 22, 2008·No. No. ED 90003·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ralph Gene Lilley appeals from the Final Award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying him workers compensation from the Second Injury Fund. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the Final Award is supported by sufficient competent and substantial evidence and is not contrary to the weight of the evidence. Knisley v. Charleswood, Corp., 211 S.W.3d 629, 633 (Mo.App. E.D.2007). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ralph Gene Lilley appeals from the Final Award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying him workers compensation from the Second Injury Fund. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the Final Award is supported by sufficient competent and substantial evidence and is not contrary to the weight of the evidence. Knisley v. Charleswood, Corp., 211 S.W.3d 629, 633 (Mo.App. E.D.2007). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Lilley v. Second Injury Fund, 243 S.W.3d 546, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 106, 2008 WL 170496 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

243 S.W.3d 546 (Lilley v. Second Injury Fund) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related