Lilley v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, S.D. Florida·Decided April 30, 2024·No. 9:20-cv-80044·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-80044-DIMITROULEAS/MATTHEWMAN

SCOTT MICHAEL LILLEY,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ANDREW M. SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant. _____________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING AND APPROVING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE; GRANTING PETITION FOR EAJA FEES

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge William Matthewman (the “Report”) [DE 30], issued on April 15, 2024, and Plaintiff’s Petition and Memorandum in Support for Reasonable Attorney Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) [DE 26]. The Court notes that no objections to the Report [DE 30] have been filed, and the time for filing such objections has passed. As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge’s factual findings in the Report [DE 30] are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this opinion. LoConte v. Dugger, 847 F.2d 745, 749-50 (11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 958 (1988); RTC v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F.2d 1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1993). Although no timely objections were filed, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report [DE 30] and record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s analysis and conclusions. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Report [DE 30] is hereby ADOPTED and APPROVED; 2. Plaintiff Petition [DE 26] is hereby GRANTED as follows: a. Plaintiff's counsel is awarded $35,618.50 in attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1)(A), to be paid out of Plaintiff's past-due benefits in accordance with agency policy; b. Plaintiff's counsel may either collect this amount and reimburse Plaintiff the $7,065.79 previously recovered in EAJA fees, or Plaintiff’s counsel may deduct the $7,065.79 EAJA fees award amount from the $35,618.50 section 406(b)(1)(A) fees award, resulting in a total attorney’s fees amount of $28,532.71, to be paid out of Plaintiffs past-due benefits. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this 30th day of April, 2024.

fl } “a 4 : “4 if % f ? f tne i ye Zo #4 v Paty 4 ‘4 ase Af CA MAGIA AYN GC VILLIAM P. DIMITROULEAS United States District Judge

Copies to: Counsel of Record Magistrate Judge William Matthewman

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lilley v. Commissioner of Social Security, (S.D. Fla. 2024).

Lilley v. Commissioner of Social Security (Lilley v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daniel Loconte v. Richard Dugger, Robert A. Butterworth
847 F.2d 745 (Eleventh Circuit, 1988)
Resolution Trust Corporation v. Hallmark Builders, Inc.
996 F.2d 1144 (Eleventh Circuit, 1993)