Lill v. Egan

89 Ill. 609
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1878
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 89 Ill. 609 (Lill v. Egan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lill v. Egan, 89 Ill. 609 (Ill. 1878).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Dickey

delivered the opinion of the Court:

It is insisted by appellants that this note was a partnership note, and for that reason the creditor was bound first to resort to the surviving partner, and collect his debt out of the partnership effects, if practicable, before attempting to reach the private property of the estate in the hands of the executors.

We find no foundation for the application of any such doctrine in this case. The money was lent to Lill, and not to the firm. The fact that the men who signed the note were members of the firm, does not constitute the making of the note a partnership transaction. True, had the money been originally lent to the firm, and had this note been given in satisfaction or in evidence of a firm debt, the question which appellants seek to raise might be presented.

We think the finding on the evidence is right, and the circuit court did right in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dailey v. Grand Lodge Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen
226 Ill. App. 164 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1922)
Low v. Arnstein
73 Ill. App. 215 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1898)
National Bank of Commerce v. Meader
41 N.W. 1043 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1889)
Howell v. Moores
19 N.E. 863 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1889)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 Ill. 609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lill-v-egan-ill-1878.