Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Lilker v. Berry

Lilker v. Berry

133 So. 3d 1246, 2014 WL 1213465, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4275
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 24, 2014
DocketNo. 1D13-5641
StatusPublished

This text of 133 So. 3d 1246 (Lilker v. Berry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lilker v. Berry, 133 So. 3d 1246, 2014 WL 1213465, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4275 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of prohibition, petitioner Stewart Lilker seeks review of the lower tribunal’s order denying petitioner’s motion for disqualification. We have jurisdiction. See, e.g., Lusskin v. State, 717 So.2d 1076, 1077 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

[1247]*1247Upon review, we find that the motion for disqualification was timely and legally sufficient. The petition is therefore granted and the trial judge is directed to enter an order of disqualification which requests the chief circuit judge to appoint a successor judge.

PADOVANO and ROBERTS, JJ., concur. BENTON, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lusskin v. State
717 So. 2d 1076 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 So. 3d 1246, 2014 WL 1213465, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lilker-v-berry-fladistctapp-2014.