Lilker v. Berry
133 So. 3d 1246, 2014 WL 1213465, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4275
Opinion
By petition for writ of prohibition, petitioner Stewart Lilker seeks review of the lower tribunal’s order denying petitioner’s motion for disqualification. We have jurisdiction. See, e.g., Lusskin v. State, 717 So.2d 1076, 1077 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).
[1247]*1247Upon review, we find that the motion for disqualification was timely and legally sufficient. The petition is therefore granted and the trial judge is directed to enter an order of disqualification which requests the chief circuit judge to appoint a successor judge.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lilker v. Berry, 133 So. 3d 1246, 2014 WL 1213465, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4275 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).
133 So. 3d 1246 (Lilker v. Berry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lusskin v. State
717 So. 2d 1076 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)