Lilienthal v. Clark
39 Fla. 789
Opinion
This action was brought by Henry Lilienthal, as plaintiff, against Charles M. Conroy. Clark & Loffcns interposed a claim to property levied on. There was judgment for the claimants and the plaintiff takes writ of error. Subsequently the plaintiff in error died, and Catherine M. E. Lilienthal, Executrix,, was made party plaintiff in error. The judgment m affirmed.
Decision Per Curiam.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lilienthal v. Clark, 39 Fla. 789 (Fla. 1897).
39 Fla. 789 (Lilienthal v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.