Liles v. State

148 So. 337, 25 Ala. App. 447, 1933 Ala. App. LEXIS 102
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided May 16, 1933·No. 8 Div. 648.·Published

Opinion

SAMFORD, Judge.

The deputy sheriff, who is the only witness, saw defendant down in a ditch where people resorted to relieve the call of nature. *448 Defendant was “hunkered down on his knee.” The deputy went down into the ditch and near where 'he had seen defendant on his knees and there found under some brush three half-pint bottles of whisky. There was no evidence connecting the defendant with the possession, and the court erred in refusing to give as requested in writing the general affirmative charge in his behalf. The following authorities are in point: McKinnon v. State, 22 Ala. App. 654, 119 So. 596; Tuggle v. State, 22 Ala. App. 89, 112 So. 540; Hayes v. State, 22 Ala. App. 264, 114 So. 674, and authorities there cited.

"The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Liles v. State, 148 So. 337, 25 Ala. App. 447, 1933 Ala. App. LEXIS 102 (Ala. Ct. App. 1933).

148 So. 337 (Liles v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McKinnon v. State
119 So. 596 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1929)
Tuggle v. State
112 So. 540 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1927)
Hayes v. State
114 So. 674 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1927)