Liker v. Grossman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Liker v. Grossman

170 A.D.2d 439, 566 N.Y.S.2d 525, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1425

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 4, 1991

StatusPublished

This text of 170 A.D.2d 439 (Liker v. Grossman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Liker v. Grossman, 170 A.D.2d 439, 566 N.Y.S.2d 525, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1425 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for conspiracy, fraud, and breach of fiduciary duty, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Williams, J.), entered June 20, 1989, which granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint and denied his cross motion to reargue the motion resulting in an order dated November 1, 1988.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order entered June 20, 1989, as denied reargument is dismissed, as no appeal lies from that portion of the order; and it is further,

Ordered that so much of the order entered June 20, 1989, as granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint is affirmed for reasons stated by Justice Williams at the Supreme Court; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondents are awarded one bill of costs.

Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Harwood and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for conspiracy, fraud, and breach of fiduciary duty, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Williams, J.), entered June 20, 1989, which granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint and denied his cross motion to reargue the motion resulting in an order dated November 1, 1988.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order entered June 20, 1989, as denied reargument is dismissed, as no appeal lies from that portion of the order; and it is further,

Ordered that so much of the order entered June 20, 1989, as granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint is affirmed for reasons stated by Justice Williams at the Supreme Court; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondents are awarded one bill of costs.

Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Harwood and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

170 A.D.2d 439, 566 N.Y.S.2d 525, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liker-v-grossman-nyappdiv-1991.