Liken v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Liken v. State

1924 OK CR 238, 228 P. 1118, 28 Okla. Crim. 114, 1924 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 235

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedOctober 9, 1924

DocketNo. A-4604.

StatusPublished

This text of 1924 OK CR 238 (Liken v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Liken v. State, 1924 OK CR 238, 228 P. 1118, 28 Okla. Crim. 114, 1924 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 235 (Okla. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Charles Liken, was convicted on a charge that he did manufacture corn whisky. In accordance with the verdict of the jury he was sentenced to pay a fine of $100 and be confined in the county jail for 30 days. From the judgment an appeal was taken by filing in this court on March 20, 1923, a petition in error, with case-made. No briefs have been filed. When the case was called for final submission, no appearance was made in behalf of plaintiff in error. The Attorney General has moved to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal. An examination of the record discloses that the errors assigned are without merit, and that plaintiff in error had a fair trial. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Charles Liken, was convicted on a charge that he did manufacture corn whisky. In accordance with the verdict of the jury he was sentenced to pay a fine of $100 and be confined in the county jail for 30 days. From the judgment an appeal was taken by filing in this court on March 20, 1923, a petition in error, with case-made. No briefs have been filed. When the case was called for final submission, no appearance was made in behalf of plaintiff in error. The Attorney General has moved to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal. An examination of the record discloses that the errors assigned are without merit, and that plaintiff in error had a fair trial. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1924 OK CR 238, 228 P. 1118, 28 Okla. Crim. 114, 1924 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liken-v-state-oklacrimapp-1924.