Ligons v. Miracle Supply Company

291 S.W.3d 372, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1234
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 1, 2009·No. ED 92024·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Miracle Supply Company appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of David Ligons (hereinafter, “Ligons”), after Li-gons filed an application for trial de novo from small claims court. The trial court, after trial de novo, awarded Ligons $1,021.84 for damage to his drain machine. Miracle Supply Company raises two points on appeal, claiming it is not responsible for any damage because a third-party made repairs to the drain machine.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. We find the claims of eiTor to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ligons v. Miracle Supply Company, 291 S.W.3d 372, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1234 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

291 S.W.3d 372 (Ligons v. Miracle Supply Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dotson v. State
291 S.W.3d 372 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)