Ligon v. Tapp
This text of 2016 Ark. 282 (Ligon v. Tapp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cite as 2016 Ark. 282
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. D-13-150
Opinion Delivered: June 23, 2016 STARK LIGON, AS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE PETITIONER PORTABLE DOCUMENT FORMAT (PDF) COPIES OF THE V. RECORDING IN LIEU OF ABSTRACT JOHN SKYLAR (SKY) TAPP RESPONDENT MOTION GRANTED.
PER CURIAM
John Skylar “Sky” Tapp, through his attorney, Jeff Rosenzweig, has filed a motion
“to substitute portable document format (PDF) copies of the record in lieu of an abstract.”
In his motion, Tapp states that his disbarment case has produced a record of twenty-seven
volumes, seventeen of which consist of testimony and three of which contain evidentiary
depositions. Tapp maintains that this court’s abstracting requirement, see Arkansas Supreme
Court Rule 4-2(a)(5) (2015), would cause considerable hardship to him and his counsel
because of the inordinate amount of time and cost associated with the abstracting process.
We grant Tapp’s motion with the following requirements imposed:
1. The documents must be in PDF format.
2. The documents must be internally searchable via Optical Character Recognition
(OCR) that is included in Adobe Acrobat. Cite as 2016 Ark. 282
3. The documents must contain a table of contents, with sections that are internally
hyperlinked to their respective places in the document.
Any further questions by the parties should be directed to our clerk for clarification or
amendment.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2016 Ark. 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ligon-v-tapp-ark-2016.