Ligon v. Revels
This text of 238 S.W.3d 609 (Ligon v. Revels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On December 29, 2005, a Petition for Disbarment was filed in this matter. On January 29, 2006, Respondent Paul E. Revels, by letter, acknowledged notice of this and set forth his desire to surrender his license. To date, no response has been filed by or for Mr. Revels, no signed Surrender Petition has been returned and filed, and he is in default under Ark. R. Civ. P. 55. Therefore, the allegations of the Petition are deemed admitted, and the proper sanction is disbarment. The name of Paul E. Revels of DeQueen, Arkansas, shall be removed from the registry of attorneys licensed by the State of Arkansas, and he is barred and enjoined from engaging in the practice of law in this state unless done pursuant to a law license-granted by another state or jurisdiction with the authority to authorize the practice of law and done in accordance with the rules of this state.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
238 S.W.3d 609, 367 Ark. 186, 2006 Ark. LEXIS 466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ligon-v-revels-ark-2006.