Ligon v. Hogrobrooks
This text of 2014 Ark. 317 (Ligon v. Hogrobrooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cite as 2014 Ark. 317
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. D-12-459
STARK LIGON, AS EXECUTIVE Opinion Delivered June 26, 2014 DIRECTOR OF THE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PLEADINGS AND FOR ENTRY OF PETITIONER FINAL ORDER OF DISBARMENT OR ALTERNATIVELY FOR A SHOW V. CAUSE HEARING AS TO WHY JUDGMENT SHOULD NOT BE H E A T H E R P A T R I C E ENTERED HOGROBROOKS, ARKANSAS BAR NO. 92029 RESPONDENT MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND FOR ENTRY OF FINAL ORDER OF DISBARMENT GRANTED.
PER CURIAM
Stark Ligon, as Executive Director of the Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on
Professional Conduct, petitions this court to impose the sanction of disbarment against
attorney Heather Patrice Hogrobrooks.
On August 27, 2012, pursuant to Arkansas Supreme Court Procedures Regulating
Professional Conduct, section 13, we assigned Special Judge John Cole to preside over
disbarment proceedings involving Heather Patrice Hogrobrooks. Judge Cole found that Ms.
Hogrobrooks committed serious misconduct that warranted disbarment. Judge Cole’s
findings of fact and conclusions of law were filed with this court, along with the transcript and
record of the proceedings. Briefing commenced and pursuant to section 13(D), Cite as 2014 Ark. 317
Ms. Hogrobrooks was to file the opening brief, which was due to be filed by January 20,
2014. Ms. Hogrobrooks obtained an extension of time and thereafter had until March 6,
2014, to file her brief. Ms. Hogrobrooks tendered her brief on March 17, 2014, but it was
rejected as non-compliant. On March 24, 2014, Ms. Hogrobrooks filed a “petition for
information regarding the status of appeal” but has filed nothing with this court since that
time.
Pursuant to section 13, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the special judge
are accepted by this court unless clearly erroneous. Here, Ms. Hogrobrooks failed to file a
brief in compliance with section 13(D). By failing to file an abstract and brief, this court’s
review is limited to Judge Cole’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. There being nothing
before this court to show Judge Cole’s findings of fact to be clearly erroneous, we grant
petitioner’s request for a final order disbarring Ms. Hogrobrooks. Her name is ordered
removed from the registry of attorneys licensed by the State of Arkansas. She is barred and
enjoined from the practice of law in this state.
Order of disbarment granted.
Stark Ligon, Executive Director, by: Michael E. Harmon, Deputy Director, for
petitioner.
Heather Patrice Hogrobrooks, pro se respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2014 Ark. 317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ligon-v-hogrobrooks-ark-2014.