Ligon v. Harper
This text of 2017 Ark. 166 (Ligon v. Harper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cite as 2017 Ark. 166
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. D-14-415
Opinion Delivered: May 4, 2017
STARK LIGON, AS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON MOTION FOR ORDER OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT DEFAULT JUDGMENT OF PETITIONER DISBARMENT
V.
KENNETH ALAN HARPER, ARKANSAS BAR NO. 89022 RESPONDENT GRANTED.
PER CURIAM
Petitioner Stark Ligon, as Executive Director of the Arkansas Supreme Court
Committee on Professional Conduct, has filed a motion for an order of default judgment
on the petition of disbarment of respondent Kenneth Alan Harper, Arkansas Bar Number
89022. We grant the motion.
On May 9, 2014, the Office of Professional Conduct filed a petition for disbarment
against Harper, and a summons was issued. Harper was personally served with the petition
and summons on May 21, 2014. He failed to answer the petition within thirty days, and a
motion for default judgment was filed on June 26, 2014. Harper tendered an untimely
answer on July 9, 2014. On July 31, 2014, we appointed the Honorable John Cole to serve
as a special judge to hear the matter and provide the court with findings of fact, conclusions Cite as 2017 Ark. 166
of law, and a recommendation of an appropriate sanction. Ligon v. Harper, 2014 Ark. 331
(per curiam).
Pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) (2016), Judge Cole entered an
order of default judgment against Harper on October 19, 2016, finding the allegations in
the petition for disbarment to be admitted. Harper was given notice of a November 10,
2016 hearing on sanctions to be imposed; however, he failed to appear at the hearing. Based
on the evidence of serious misconduct presented at the hearing, Judge Cole filed findings of
fact and conclusions of law with this court on February 17, 2017, recommending a sanction
of disbarment. On February 21, 2017, the clerk of this court issued a briefing schedule to
the parties pursuant to section 13 of the Arkansas Supreme Court Procedures Regulating
Professional Conduct of Attorneys at Law. The briefing schedule directed that Harper, as
the respondent, file his brief by April 2, 2017. Harper failed to submit a brief by April 2,
2017, and no request for an extension of time has been filed.
Because Harper’s failure to file an abstract and brief leaves this court with nothing to
review with regard to Judge Cole’s findings, we grant petitioner’s request for a final order
disbarring Harper. In re Brown, 369 Ark. App’x 566, 252 S.W.3d 137 (2007). His name
shall be removed from the registry of attorneys licensed by the State of Arkansas, and he is
barred and enjoined from engaging in the practice of law in this state.
It is so ordered.
D-14-415 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2017 Ark. 166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ligon-v-harper-ark-2017.