Ligon v. Harper

2017 Ark. 166
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedMay 4, 2017
DocketD-14-415
StatusPublished

This text of 2017 Ark. 166 (Ligon v. Harper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ligon v. Harper, 2017 Ark. 166 (Ark. 2017).

Opinion

Cite as 2017 Ark. 166

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. D-14-415

Opinion Delivered: May 4, 2017

STARK LIGON, AS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON MOTION FOR ORDER OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT DEFAULT JUDGMENT OF PETITIONER DISBARMENT

V.

KENNETH ALAN HARPER, ARKANSAS BAR NO. 89022 RESPONDENT GRANTED.

PER CURIAM

Petitioner Stark Ligon, as Executive Director of the Arkansas Supreme Court

Committee on Professional Conduct, has filed a motion for an order of default judgment

on the petition of disbarment of respondent Kenneth Alan Harper, Arkansas Bar Number

89022. We grant the motion.

On May 9, 2014, the Office of Professional Conduct filed a petition for disbarment

against Harper, and a summons was issued. Harper was personally served with the petition

and summons on May 21, 2014. He failed to answer the petition within thirty days, and a

motion for default judgment was filed on June 26, 2014. Harper tendered an untimely

answer on July 9, 2014. On July 31, 2014, we appointed the Honorable John Cole to serve

as a special judge to hear the matter and provide the court with findings of fact, conclusions Cite as 2017 Ark. 166

of law, and a recommendation of an appropriate sanction. Ligon v. Harper, 2014 Ark. 331

(per curiam).

Pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) (2016), Judge Cole entered an

order of default judgment against Harper on October 19, 2016, finding the allegations in

the petition for disbarment to be admitted. Harper was given notice of a November 10,

2016 hearing on sanctions to be imposed; however, he failed to appear at the hearing. Based

on the evidence of serious misconduct presented at the hearing, Judge Cole filed findings of

fact and conclusions of law with this court on February 17, 2017, recommending a sanction

of disbarment. On February 21, 2017, the clerk of this court issued a briefing schedule to

the parties pursuant to section 13 of the Arkansas Supreme Court Procedures Regulating

Professional Conduct of Attorneys at Law. The briefing schedule directed that Harper, as

the respondent, file his brief by April 2, 2017. Harper failed to submit a brief by April 2,

2017, and no request for an extension of time has been filed.

Because Harper’s failure to file an abstract and brief leaves this court with nothing to

review with regard to Judge Cole’s findings, we grant petitioner’s request for a final order

disbarring Harper. In re Brown, 369 Ark. App’x 566, 252 S.W.3d 137 (2007). His name

shall be removed from the registry of attorneys licensed by the State of Arkansas, and he is

barred and enjoined from engaging in the practice of law in this state.

It is so ordered.

D-14-415 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Brown
252 S.W.3d 137 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2007)
Ligon v. Harper
2014 Ark. 331 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 Ark. 166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ligon-v-harper-ark-2017.