Ligon v. Dunklin

237 S.W.3d 78, 366 Ark. 582
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ligon v. Dunklin. Read the opinion of the Court — 368 Ark. 443
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided June 15, 2006·No. 04-661·Published

Opinion

ER CuRI~.

Special Judge, Jack L. Lessenberry, filed his Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Recommendation of Sanctions on May 22, 2006. See Section 13 of the Procedures Regulating Professional Conduct. The parties now must file briefs. Section 13D. We request the Supreme Court Clerk to set briefing schedules for the respective parties. Moreover, we bring to the parties’ attention our most recent case of Ligon v. Newman, 365 Ark. 510, 231 S.W.3d 662 (2006), for whatever relevance it may have in this appeal. See also Ligon v. Newman, 361 Ark. 354, 206 S.W.3d 826 (2005) (per curiam).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ligon v. Dunklin, 237 S.W.3d 78, 366 Ark. 582 (Ark. 2006).

237 S.W.3d 78 (Ligon v. Dunklin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ligon v. Newman
231 S.W.3d 662 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2006)
Ligon v. Newman
206 S.W.3d 826 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2005)