Lightning Typographical Craftsmen, Inc. v. Hochman
250 A.D. 718, 294 N.Y.S. 722, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8597
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lightning Typographical Craftsmen, Inc. v. Hochman. Read the opinion of the Court — 248 A.D. 605 →
Opinion
Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Johnston and Close, J J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lightning Typographical Craftsmen, Inc. v. Hochman, 250 A.D. 718, 294 N.Y.S. 722, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8597 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).
250 A.D. 718 (Lightning Typographical Craftsmen, Inc. v. Hochman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.