Lightning Optical Corp. v. Virgo Optics, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lightning Optical Corp. v. Virgo Optics, Inc.

572 So. 2d 1, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7367, 1990 WL 140308

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 26, 1990

DocketNo. 90-00937

StatusPublished

This text of 572 So. 2d 1 (Lightning Optical Corp. v. Virgo Optics, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lightning Optical Corp. v. Virgo Optics, Inc., 572 So. 2d 1, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7367, 1990 WL 140308 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lightning Optical Corporation petitions this court for certiorari review of an order of the circuit court which requires disclosure of certain documents which, Lightning contends, include confidential and privileged information. After consideration of all the pleadings, including in camera review of the documents in question, we cannot conclude that the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law in ordering disclosure to respondent. Accordingly, we deny the petition for certiorari. In so doing, we construe the circuit court’s order of January 16, 1990, and all subsequent discovery orders, as strictly prohibiting disclosure of any information revealed through this discovery process to anyone not directly involved with this litigation.

RYDER, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and LEHAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Lightning Optical Corporation petitions this court for certiorari review of an order of the circuit court which requires disclosure of certain documents which, Lightning contends, include confidential and privileged information. After consideration of all the pleadings, including in camera review of the documents in question, we cannot conclude that the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law in ordering disclosure to respondent. Accordingly, we deny the petition for certiorari. In so doing, we construe the circuit court’s order of January 16, 1990, and all subsequent discovery orders, as strictly prohibiting disclosure of any information revealed through this discovery process to anyone not directly involved with this litigation.

RYDER, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and LEHAN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

572 So. 2d 1, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7367, 1990 WL 140308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lightning-optical-corp-v-virgo-optics-inc-fladistctapp-1990.