Lightfoot v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lightfoot v. State

801 So. 2d 313, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17749, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2967

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 17, 2001

DocketNo. 1D00-3308

StatusPublished

This text of 801 So. 2d 313 (Lightfoot v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lightfoot v. State, 801 So. 2d 313, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17749, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2967 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the revocation of the appellant’s probation because the trial court did not abuse its discretion. Bell v. State, 643 So.2d 674, 675 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). The appellant’s remaining claims are without merit because the appellant accepted the benefits associated with his sentence. Huff v. State, 672 So.2d 634, 635 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)(holding that even though the appellant’s original suspended sentence may have been improper, it was not reversible error because the appellant received the benefits of the improper sentence).

AFFIRMED.

BARFIELD, VAN NORTWICK and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the revocation of the appellant’s probation because the trial court did not abuse its discretion. Bell v. State, 643 So.2d 674, 675 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). The appellant’s remaining claims are without merit because the appellant accepted the benefits associated with his sentence. Huff v. State, 672 So.2d 634, 635 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)(holding that even though the appellant’s original suspended sentence may have been improper, it was not reversible error because the appellant received the benefits of the improper sentence).

AFFIRMED.

BARFIELD, VAN NORTWICK and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

801 So. 2d 313, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17749, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lightfoot-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack