Lightfoot v. State
533 So. 2d 930, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2534, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5079, 1988 WL 122617
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 18, 1988·No. No. 87-1677·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Appellant’s timely motion to withdraw his plea, which was made after the trial judge refused the jointly recommended sentence of the state and defense counsel, should have been granted. Stanley v. State, 501 So.2d 90 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). Because the appellant is still on probation, his case is not moot.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lightfoot v. State, 533 So. 2d 930, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2534, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5079, 1988 WL 122617 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
533 So. 2d 930 (Lightfoot v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sharpe v. State
547 So. 2d 334 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)