Lightfoot v. State
533 So. 2d 930, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2534, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5079, 1988 WL 122617
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 18, 1988
DocketNo. 87-1677
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 533 So. 2d 930 (Lightfoot v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lightfoot v. State, 533 So. 2d 930, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2534, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5079, 1988 WL 122617 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
Opinion
Appellant’s timely motion to withdraw his plea, which was made after the trial judge refused the jointly recommended sentence of the state and defense counsel, should have been granted. Stanley v. State, 501 So.2d 90 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). Because the appellant is still on probation, his case is not moot.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sharpe v. State
547 So. 2d 334 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
533 So. 2d 930, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2534, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5079, 1988 WL 122617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lightfoot-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.