Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Light v. State

Light v. State

799 So. 2d 1082, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 14895, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2538
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Light v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 841 So. 2d 623 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 19, 2001·No. No. 2D01-3807·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to any right appellant might have to file a timely, facially sufficient motion to withdraw his plea pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

FULMER, A.C.J., and CASANUEVA and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Light v. State, 799 So. 2d 1082, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 14895, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2538 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

799 So. 2d 1082 (Light v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murphy v. State
773 So. 2d 1174 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)