Light v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Light v. State

667 So. 2d 437, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 391, 1996 WL 23625

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 24, 1996

DocketNo. 94-01356

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 667 So. 2d 437 (Light v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Light v. State, 667 So. 2d 437, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 391, 1996 WL 23625 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

QUINCE, Judge.

The appellant, James L. Light, raises two points on appeal. We find merit only in his contention that the court erred in enhancing his sentence for aggravated assault. Therefore, we reverse solely for resentencing on this offense.

The appellant was convicted on various charges, including aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer with a firearm in violation of section 784.07(2)(c), Florida Statutes (1993). Under this statute, aggravated assault, a third-degree felony, is enhanced to a second-degree felony. The trial court additionally enhanced the conviction to a first-degree felony because the offense was committed with a firearm.

An offense cannot be enhanced for committing the offense with a firearm if a firearm is an essential element of the charge. Rodriguez v. State, 650 So.2d 1111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). Since using a firearm was an essential element of the offense, the trial court erred in enhancing the offense to a first-degree felony. We reverse and remand for resentencing.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI