Light v. Ohio Casualty Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Light v. Ohio Casualty Insurance

161 N.W.2d 764, 11 Mich. App. 569, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1327

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 31, 1968

DocketDocket No. 3,901

StatusPublished

This text of 161 N.W.2d 764 (Light v. Ohio Casualty Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Light v. Ohio Casualty Insurance, 161 N.W.2d 764, 11 Mich. App. 569, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1327 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This nonjury action on a hunters’ accident insurance policy resulted in a judgment of no cause of action. Plaintiff appeals.

[570]*570We concur in the finding of the trial judge that the policy is unambiguous, and we find the parol testimony as to coverage is immaterial.

The trial court’s finding that the death did not result from an accident or other physical occurrence within the purview of the policy is supported by the record.

Affirmed.

Lesinski, C. J., and Quinn and Moody, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI