Light v. Ohio Casualty Insurance
161 N.W.2d 764, 11 Mich. App. 569, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1327
Opinion
This nonjury action on a hunters’ accident insurance policy resulted in a judgment of no cause of action. Plaintiff appeals.
[570] We concur in the finding of the trial judge that the policy is unambiguous, and we find the parol testimony as to coverage is immaterial.
The trial court’s finding that the death did not result from an accident or other physical occurrence within the purview of the policy is supported by the record.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Light v. Ohio Casualty Insurance, 161 N.W.2d 764, 11 Mich. App. 569, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1327 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968).
161 N.W.2d 764 (Light v. Ohio Casualty Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.