Light v. Mullins

Supreme Court of Alabama

Light v. Mullins

454 So. 2d 981, 1984 Ala. LEXIS 4328

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJuly 13, 1984

Docket83-383

StatusPublished

This text of 454 So. 2d 981 (Light v. Mullins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Light v. Mullins, 454 So. 2d 981, 1984 Ala. LEXIS 4328 (Ala. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Robert Light brought suit against Randall Mullins for a determination of the proper sum of money necessary to redeem certain real estate from a mortgage foreclosure sale to Randall Mullins. The trial judge found that $38,862.63 was the proper sum. In this amount was an item for removal of an outbuilding by Mullins. Light objects to his having to pay for the removal.

After reviewing the evidence, we cannot say that the trial judge committed error. Consequently, under the ore tenus rule, the judgment is affirmed. Chism v. Hicks, 423 So.2d 143 (Ala.1982).

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C.J., and FAULKNER, AL-MON, EMBRY and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI