Liggins v. William A. Hazel, Inc.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1772

KENNETH D. LIGGINS,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

WILLIAM A. HAZEL, INC.; DARRELL WOLFE; TOMMY SHELL; LASZLO ESZENYI,

Defendants – Appellees.

No. 08-1971

WILLIAM A. HAZEL, INC.; DARRELL WOLFE; TOMMY SHELL; LASZLO ESZENYI,

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:07-cv-01084-LMB-JFA)

Submitted: October 9, 2009 Decided: October 23, 2009

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth D. Liggins, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Mark Dare, ISLER, DARE, RAY, RADCLIFFE & CONNOLLY, PC, Vienna, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Kenneth D. Liggins appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2006) complaint and

ordering him to pay attorneys fees and costs in the amount of

$5,000. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny Liggins’s motion to compel and we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Liggins v. William A. Hazel, Inc., No. 1:07-cv-01084-LMB-JFA

(E.D. Va. filed June 20, 2008 & entered June 23, 2008; filed

Aug. 8, 2008 & entered Aug. 11, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED