Liggins v. Police Department
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2360
KENNETH D. LIGGINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
CG6 CONCRETE SPECIALISTS, INCORPORATED,
Plaintiff,
versus
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Town of Berryville, Virginia; D. ELDEN NESSELRODT; KEITH DALTON; TOWN OF BERRYVILLE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (CA-04-14-5-GEC)
Submitted: March 10, 2005 Decided: March 14, 2005
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth D. Liggins, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Keith Brake, KEELER OBENSHAIN, P.C., Harrisonburg, Virginia; Edward Harrison Grove, III, BRAULT, PALMER, GROVER, WHITE & STEINHILBER, L.L.P., Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
Kenneth D. Liggins appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Liggins v.
Police Dep’t, CA-04-14-5-GEC (W.D. Va., filed Sept. 30, 2004;
entered Oct. 1, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Liggins v. Police Department (Liggins v. Police Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.