Liggins v. Police Department

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 14, 2005·No. 04-2360·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-2360

KENNETH D. LIGGINS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

CG6 CONCRETE SPECIALISTS, INCORPORATED,

Plaintiff,

versus

POLICE DEPARTMENT, Town of Berryville, Virginia; D. ELDEN NESSELRODT; KEITH DALTON; TOWN OF BERRYVILLE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (CA-04-14-5-GEC)

Submitted: March 10, 2005 Decided: March 14, 2005

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth D. Liggins, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Keith Brake, KEELER OBENSHAIN, P.C., Harrisonburg, Virginia; Edward Harrison Grove, III, BRAULT, PALMER, GROVER, WHITE & STEINHILBER, L.L.P., Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Kenneth D. Liggins appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Liggins v.

Police Dep’t, CA-04-14-5-GEC (W.D. Va., filed Sept. 30, 2004;

entered Oct. 1, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Liggins v. Police Department, (4th Cir. 2005).

Liggins v. Police Department (Liggins v. Police Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related