Liggieri v. Pasternack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Liggieri v. Pasternack

51 A.D.2d 731, 379 N.Y.S.2d 137, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11223

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 2, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 51 A.D.2d 731 (Liggieri v. Pasternack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Liggieri v. Pasternack, 51 A.D.2d 731, 379 N.Y.S.2d 137, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11223 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., appellants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 28, 1974, as is in favor of plaintiffs and against them, after a jury trial limited to the issue of liability only. Interlocutory judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs jointly to respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs. The evidence adequately supports the findings of the jury (see Pfaffenbach v White Plains Express Corp., 17 NY2d 132). Further, the charge was both fair and adequate. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Hargett, Damiani and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., appellants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 28, 1974, as is in favor of plaintiffs and against them, after a jury trial limited to the issue of liability only. Interlocutory judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs jointly to respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs. The evidence adequately supports the findings of the jury (see Pfaffenbach v White Plains Express Corp., 17 NY2d 132). Further, the charge was both fair and adequate. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Hargett, Damiani and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 731, 379 N.Y.S.2d 137, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liggieri-v-pasternack-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack