Liggett Group, Inc. v. Davis

997 So. 2d 400, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 963, 2008 Fla. LEXIS 2375, 2008 WL 5170616
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedDecember 11, 2008
DocketSC08-541
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 997 So. 2d 400 (Liggett Group, Inc. v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Liggett Group, Inc. v. Davis, 997 So. 2d 400, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 963, 2008 Fla. LEXIS 2375, 2008 WL 5170616 (Fla. 2008).

Opinion

997 So.2d 400 (2008)

LIGGETT GROUP, INC., Petitioner,
v.
Scott DAVIS, etc., Respondent.

No. SC08-541.

Supreme Court of Florida.

December 11, 2008.

Alvin B. Davis of Squire, Sanders and Dempsey, LLP, Miami, FL, for Petitioner.

John Venable of Venable and Venable, P.A., Tampa, FL, Angel M. Reyes and Daniel F. O'Shea of Reyes, O'Shea and Coloca, P.A., Coral Gables, FL, and Todd R. Schwartz of Ginsberg and Schwartz, Miami, FL, for Respondent.

Daniel B. Rogers of Shook, Hardy and Bacon, LLP, Miami, FL, Victor E. Schwartz and Mark A. Behrens of Shook, Hardy and Bacon, LLP, Washington, D.C., and Robin S. Conrad, National Chamber Litigation Center, Inc., Washington, D.C., on behalf of Associated Industries of Florida, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, National Association of Manufacturers, American Tort Reform Association, Property Casualty Insurers Association *401 of America, and National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies; and Christopher V. Carlyle and Shannon McLin Carlyle of The Carlyle Appellate Law Firm, The Villages, FL, on behalf of Florida Justice Association and the American Association for Justice, for Amici Curiae.

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Liggett Group, Inc. v. Davis, 973 So.2d 467 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007), a decision in which the Fourth District Court of Appeal certified two questions to be of great public importance. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. However, upon further consideration, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion to discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

QUINCE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, CANADY, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

LEWIS, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

HEALTH CARE AND RETIREMENT CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC. v. Bradley
997 So. 2d 400 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
997 So. 2d 400, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 963, 2008 Fla. LEXIS 2375, 2008 WL 5170616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liggett-group-inc-v-davis-fla-2008.