Ligety v. B. & E. Alper, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ligety v. B. & E. Alper, Inc.

262 A.D. 1033, 30 N.Y.S.2d 335, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7122

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 14, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 262 A.D. 1033 (Ligety v. B. & E. Alper, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ligety v. B. & E. Alper, Inc., 262 A.D. 1033, 30 N.Y.S.2d 335, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7122 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover salesman’s commissions, based on the furnishing of false statements of sales and deliveries, order denying defendants’ motion directed against the complaint under rules 106, 90 and 103, Rules of Civil Practice, reversed on the law, without costs, and motion granted, without costs, to the extent of dismissing the second cause of action, with leave to plaintiff, if he be so advised, to serve a new complaint within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. In all other respects the motion is denied, without costs. The second cause of action contains no sufficient allegation for a cause of action in fraud. Lazansky, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover salesman’s commissions, based on the furnishing of false statements of sales and deliveries, order denying defendants’ motion directed against the complaint under rules 106, 90 and 103, Rules of Civil Practice, reversed on the law, without costs, and motion granted, without costs, to the extent of dismissing the second cause of action, with leave to plaintiff, if he be so advised, to serve a new complaint within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. In all other respects the motion is denied, without costs. The second cause of action contains no sufficient allegation for a cause of action in fraud. Lazansky, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D. 1033, 30 N.Y.S.2d 335, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ligety-v-b-e-alper-inc-nyappdiv-1941.