Ligeri v. Ligeri

22 Misc. 2d 124, 202 N.Y.S.2d 568, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3220
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedApril 7, 1960
StatusPublished

This text of 22 Misc. 2d 124 (Ligeri v. Ligeri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ligeri v. Ligeri, 22 Misc. 2d 124, 202 N.Y.S.2d 568, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3220 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1960).

Opinion

Mario Pittoni, J.

Motion for a physical examination of plaintiff, Barbara Ligeri, to be conducted by a physician designated by the court granted. The defendant, however, shall furnish a copy of the examining physician’s report to the attorney for the plaintiffs (Pink v. Valentine, 10 A D 2d 583 [2d Dept.]).

Motion for a discovery and inspection of X rays taken by the plaintiff’s physician is also granted as X rays are presumably admissible in evidence (Yudenfreund v. Mortimer, 9 A D [125]*1252d 935 [2d Dept.]; Moskowitz v. Seaman, 10 A D 2d 635 [2d Dept.]).

Belief under request 4, staying all proceedings until compliance by the plaintiff, Barbara Ligeri, is also granted. Submit order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 Misc. 2d 124, 202 N.Y.S.2d 568, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ligeri-v-ligeri-nysupct-1960.