Liftin v. Manor Realty Co.

Sixth Circuit

Liftin v. Manor Realty Co.

119 F.2d 422, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 3742

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedApril 16, 1941

DocketNo. 8831

StatusPublished

This text of 119 F.2d 422 (Liftin v. Manor Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Liftin v. Manor Realty Co., 119 F.2d 422, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 3742 (6th Cir. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard upon the original papers (Sec. 250 Chandler Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 650) and briefs and was argued by counsel for appellant, upon consideration of all which the court is of the opinion that the District Court did not abuse its discretion in the allowance to Sidney J. Liftin, attorney for certain bondholders, of an attorney fee of $800 and expenses amounting to $227.37.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the order appealed from be, and the same is in all things, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard upon the original papers (Sec. 250 Chandler Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 650) and briefs and was argued by counsel for appellant, upon consideration of all which the court is of the opinion that the District Court did not abuse its discretion in the allowance to Sidney J. Liftin, attorney for certain bondholders, of an attorney fee of $800 and expenses amounting to $227.37.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the order appealed from be, and the same is in all things, affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 F.2d 422, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 3742, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liftin-v-manor-realty-co-ca6-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack