Lifter v. Earle Co.
104 A. 676, 261 Pa. 450, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 763
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lifter v. Earle Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 270 Pa. 496 →
Opinion
The decree in this case was interlocutory, and the ap[452]*452peal from it is, therefore, quashed, at appellant’s costs, without prejudice to his right to present his claim for rent as a preferred one upon distribution of the funds in the hands of the receiver.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lifter v. Earle Co., 104 A. 676, 261 Pa. 450, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 763 (Pa. 1918).
104 A. 676 (Lifter v. Earle Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.