Lifson v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lifson v. Board of Education

109 A.D.2d 743, 486 N.Y.S.2d 61, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47226

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 4, 1985

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 109 A.D.2d 743 (Lifson v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lifson v. Board of Education, 109 A.D.2d 743, 486 N.Y.S.2d 61, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47226 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the respondent board of education to reinstate petitioner as a teacher with tenure nunc pro tunc as of June 27, 1983, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Weiner, J.), entered June 7, 1984, which dismissed the proceeding.

Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Petitioner did not begin teaching until February 15, 1980 of the spring 1980 term, which commenced on January 28, 1980. She did not, therefore, complete the full spring 1980 term, and is not entitled to credit for this service (Matter of Motak, 16 Ed Dept Rep 358; Matter of Matera, 17 Ed Dept Rep 459). Consequently, petitioner’s dismissal at the end of the spring 1983 term, which was the end of her probationary period, was proper. Titone, J. P., O’Connor, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur. [124 Misc 2d 483.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the respondent board of education to reinstate petitioner as a teacher with tenure nunc pro tunc as of June 27, 1983, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Weiner, J.), entered June 7, 1984, which dismissed the proceeding.

Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Petitioner did not begin teaching until February 15, 1980 of the spring 1980 term, which commenced on January 28, 1980. She did not, therefore, complete the full spring 1980 term, and is not entitled to credit for this service (Matter of Motak, 16 Ed Dept Rep 358; Matter of Matera, 17 Ed Dept Rep 459). Consequently, petitioner’s dismissal at the end of the spring 1983 term, which was the end of her probationary period, was proper. Titone, J. P., O’Connor, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur. [124 Misc 2d 483.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 A.D.2d 743, 486 N.Y.S.2d 61, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lifson-v-board-of-education-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack