Lifson v. Board of Education
489 N.E.2d 761, 66 N.Y.2d 896, 498 N.Y.S.2d 792, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 17988
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, without costs. Respondent properly denied petitioner "Jarema Act credit” (Education Law § 2509 [1] [a]) for two incomplete terms of service (see, Matter of Motak, 16 Ed Dept Rep 358, 359-360).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander. Taking no part: Judge Titone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lifson v. Board of Education, 489 N.E.2d 761, 66 N.Y.2d 896, 498 N.Y.S.2d 792, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 17988 (N.Y. 1985).
489 N.E.2d 761 (Lifson v. Board of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Berrios v. Board of Education of Yonkers City School District
87 A.D.3d 329 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Speichler v. Board of Cooperative Educational Services
681 N.E.2d 366 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)
Speichler v. Board of Cooperative Educational Services
227 A.D.2d 635 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)