Liffiton v. Town of Amherst

104 A.D.2d 721, 480 N.Y.S.2d 655, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20141

Opinion

— Order unanimously [722]*722affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Special Term properly held that a factual question existed concerning whether the graduated sewer “tap-in” fees imposed by defendants pursuant to section 198 (subd 1, par [h]) of the Town Law are “greater than * * * reasonably necessary to cover the cost of issuance, inspection and enforcement” (Matter of Torsoe Bros. Constr. Corp. v Board of Trustees, 49 AD2d 461, 465). (Appeals from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Gossel, J. — summary judgment.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Green, Moule and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Liffiton v. Town of Amherst, 104 A.D.2d 721, 480 N.Y.S.2d 655, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20141 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

104 A.D.2d 721 (Liffiton v. Town of Amherst) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Torsoe Bros. Construction Corp. v. Board of Trustees
49 A.D.2d 461 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)