Liffiton v. Grossman, Levine & Civiletto

100 A.D.2d 732, 473 N.Y.S.2d 646, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17725
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 6, 1984
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 100 A.D.2d 732 (Liffiton v. Grossman, Levine & Civiletto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Liffiton v. Grossman, Levine & Civiletto, 100 A.D.2d 732, 473 N.Y.S.2d 646, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17725 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The unconstitutionality of CPLR 5222 is not properly presented for review since it does not appear from the record that this objection was raised at Special Term, and there has been no notice to the Attorney-General (CPLR 1012, subd [b]; Executive Law, § 71; see Blue Giant Equip. Corp. v Tec-Ser, Inc., 92 AD2d 630, 631; Matter of Tonya Louise M., 91 AD2d 868, 869). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Joslin, J. — summary judgment.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Denman, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Wynn
11 A.D.3d 1014 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Bader v. Board of Education
216 A.D.2d 708 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 A.D.2d 732, 473 N.Y.S.2d 646, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liffiton-v-grossman-levine-civiletto-nyappdiv-1984.