Liffiton v. Buffalo Evening News

143 A.D.2d 515, 532 N.Y.S.2d 947, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10739

This text of 143 A.D.2d 515 (Liffiton v. Buffalo Evening News) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Liffiton v. Buffalo Evening News, 143 A.D.2d 515, 532 N.Y.S.2d 947, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10739 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Special Term properly granted summary judgment to defendants and dismissed plaintiff’s complaint which alleged that defendants published false reports regarding two Federal indictments returned against him. Since defendants have established that each report was substantially accurate (see, Holy Spirit Assn. v New York Times Co., 49 NY2d 63, 67; cf., Dibble v WROC-TV, 142 AD2d 966), they are entitled to the statutory privilege in this libel action (Civil Rights Law § 74). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, McGowan, J. — summary judgment.) Present— Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dibble v. WROC TV Channel 8
142 A.D.2d 966 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
143 A.D.2d 515, 532 N.Y.S.2d 947, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liffiton-v-buffalo-evening-news-nyappdiv-1988.