Lifete v. State

100 So. 3d 179, 2012 WL 5233537, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18481
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 24, 2012·No. No. 2D12-1481·Published

Opinion

VILLANTI, Judge.

Elifen Lifete appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, which the postconviction court denied as untimely. We affirm. See Barrios-Cruz v. State, 63 So.3d 868 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). As in Barrios-Cruz, 63 So.3d at 870, we hold that Padilla v. Kentucky, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), does not apply retroactively in postconviction proceedings, and we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question of great public importance pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v):

SHOULD THE RULING IN PADILLA V. KENTUCKY, — U.S.-, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), BE APPLIED RETROACTIVELY IN POSTCONVICTION PROCEEDINGS?

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA and KELLY, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lifete v. State, 100 So. 3d 179, 2012 WL 5233537, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18481 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

100 So. 3d 179 (Lifete v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Padilla v. Kentucky
559 U.S. 356 (Supreme Court, 2010)
Barrios-Cruz v. State
63 So. 3d 868 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)