Lifestyle Enter., Inc. v. United States

2014 CIT 125
United States Court of International Trade·Decided October 28, 2014·No. Consol. 09-00378·Published

Opinion

Slip Op. 14–

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

LIFESTYLE ENTERPRISE, INC., EMERALD HOME FURNISHINGS, LLC, and RON’S WAREHOUSE FURNITURE D/B/A VINEYARD FURNITURE INTERNATIONAL LLC,

Plaintiffs,

and

DREAM ROOMS FURNITURE (SHANGHAI) CO., LTD. and GUANGDONG YIHUA TIMBER INDUSTRY CO., LTD.,

Consolidated Plaintiffs,

ORIENT INTERNATIONAL HOLDING SHANGHAI FOREIGN TRADE CO., LTD.,

Intervenor Plaintiff,

v. Before: Jane A. Restani, Judge

UNITED STATES and UNITED STATES Consol. Court No. 09-00378 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE,

Defendants,

and

AMERICAN FURNITURE MANUFACTURERS COMMITTEE FOR LEGAL TRADE and VAUGHAN-BASSETT FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.,

Intervenor Defendants.

Consol. Court No. 09-00378 Page 2

Judgment

RESTANI, Judge: The parties agree that in its Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Fourth Remand, ECF No. 239 (“Fourth Remand Results”), the United States Department of Commerce complied with the court’s fourth remand order and the Fourth Remand Results are consistent with the opinion of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Lifestyle Enterprise, Inc. v. United States, 751 F.3d 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2014). Accordingly the Fourth Remand Results are SUSTAINED.

/s/ Jane A. Restani

Jane A. Restani

Judge

Dated: 2FWREHU , 2014 New York, New York

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lifestyle Enter., Inc. v. United States, 2014 CIT 125 (cit 2014).

2014 CIT 125 (Lifestyle Enter., Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lifestyle Enterprise, Inc. v. United States
751 F.3d 1371 (Federal Circuit, 2014)