Life Science Church v. United States of America Albert Yandek, Revenue Agent, Internal Revenue Service

810 F.2d 201, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 33794, 1986 WL 18387
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedNovember 19, 1986
Docket85-3458
StatusUnpublished

This text of 810 F.2d 201 (Life Science Church v. United States of America Albert Yandek, Revenue Agent, Internal Revenue Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Life Science Church v. United States of America Albert Yandek, Revenue Agent, Internal Revenue Service, 810 F.2d 201, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 33794, 1986 WL 18387 (6th Cir. 1986).

Opinion

810 F.2d 201

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
LIFE SCIENCE CHURCH, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America; Albert Yandek, Revenue Agent,
Internal Revenue Service, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 85-3458.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Nov. 19, 1986.

Before KEITH, GUY and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The government moves to dismiss this appeal because it "sought and obtained full compliance" with the Internal Revenue Service third party record keeper summonses which are the subject of this appeal. The Life Science Church filed a response.

When a party against whom a summons is issued has complied, a case or controversy no longer exists. United States v. Aquinas College Credit Union, 635 F.2d 887, 888 (6th Cir.1980), cert. denied sub nom., 450 U.S. 1042 (1981). The church's First Amendment argument, which it raised unsuccessfully in seeking a stay of enforcement, does not provide a basis to depart from the rule that the absence of a case or controversy moots the appeal. United States v. Barrett, 787 F.2d 958, 959-60 (5th Cir.1986); United States v. Patmon, 630 F.2d 458, 459 (6th Cir.1980) (per curiam).

It is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss is granted and the case is remanded to the district court with instructions to vacate the enforcement order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Patmon
630 F.2d 458 (Sixth Circuit, 1980)
United States v. Aquinas College Credit Union
635 F.2d 887 (Sixth Circuit, 1980)
United States v. Barrett
787 F.2d 958 (Fifth Circuit, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
810 F.2d 201, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 33794, 1986 WL 18387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/life-science-church-v-united-states-of-america-alb-ca6-1986.