Life Insurance Co. of Virginia v. Proctor

89 S.E. 1088, 18 Ga. App. 517, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1081
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 15, 1916·No. 6904·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Wade, C. J.

1. “When a plaintiff’s right to recover on a contract depends on a condition precedent, to be performed by him, he must allege and prove the performance of such condition precedent, or allege a sufficient legal excuse for its non-performance.” Griswold v. Scott, 13 Ga. 210 (2). See also 13 Cyc. 107, 108.

2. The court erred in overruling the demurrer to the petition as amended, since the plaintiff failed to allege payment of premiums on the policy of insurance, which payment was a condition precedent to a recovery on the contract. The remaining proceedings were therefore nugatory.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Life Insurance Co. of Virginia v. Proctor, 89 S.E. 1088, 18 Ga. App. 517, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1081 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

89 S.E. 1088 (Life Insurance Co. of Virginia v. Proctor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wolverine Insurance v. Sorrough
177 S.E.2d 819 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Nutting v. Wilson
42 S.E.2d 575 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)
Mitchell v. Liberty National Life Insurance
34 S.E.2d 583 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1945)
National Life & Accident Insurance v. Lockett
16 S.E.2d 776 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
Kansas City Life Insurance v. Williams
200 S.E. 329 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. Hulme
197 S.E. 85 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
Daniel v. Dalton News Co.
173 S.E. 727 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Loewenherz v. Weil
127 S.E. 883 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
Smith v. Roddenbery Hardware Co.
100 S.E. 718 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)