Life & Casualty Insurance Co. of Tennessee v. Davis
Opinion
This is a motion for an appeal from a judgment against appellant in favor of ap-pellee for $1,000. The suit was upon a .policy of insurance on an infant child and ■ the defense was that false and fraudulent [544] statements were made in the application. The application contained no limitation on the authority of the agent who sold the policy and it was never attached to the policy. The limitation so relied upon was contained only in the policy which was later issued. This case is controlled by Employers Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Cunningham, Ky., 253 S.W.2d 393.
The motion for appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
280 S.W.2d 543 (Life & Casualty Insurance Co. of Tennessee v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.