Life Ass'n v. Catlin

2 Walk. 338
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 3, 1879·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[342] The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Common. Pleas on November 3, 1879, in the following opinion:

Per Curiam.

It is too clear for argument that trover was not the proper form of action in this case. It was for the amount of premiums on policies of life insurance, received by the defendant as an agent of the plaintiffs, for which he was to have a percentage. When he received tlie money he was simply liable to account and pay over the balance. There was no obligation to pay the-identical coin or note, or notes he had received. We adopt the opinion of the President of the Court below, on the motion for a new trial, as the opinion of this Court.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Life Ass'n v. Catlin, 2 Walk. 338 (Pa. 1879).

2 Walk. 338 (Life Ass'n v. Catlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sterrett v. Royal Indemnity Co.
26 Pa. D. & C. 254 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1936)