Lieux v. Zurich Insurance Co.
458 So. 2d 1224, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2471, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15884
Opinion
We reverse the summary judgment in this “slip and fall” case because there are disputed issues of fact or reasonable inferences therefrom as to what caused the fall and the resulting injury. Wills v. Sears, Roebuck & Company, 351 So.2d 29 (Fla. 1977); Visingardi v. Tirone, 193 So.2d 601 (Fla.1966); Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966).
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lieux v. Zurich Insurance Co., 458 So. 2d 1224, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2471, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15884 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).
458 So. 2d 1224 (Lieux v. Zurich Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wills v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
351 So. 2d 29 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)
Visingardi v. Tirone
193 So. 2d 601 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1966)
Holl v. Talcott
191 So. 2d 40 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1966)