Lier v. Bloomingdale Bros.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lier v. Bloomingdale Bros.

274 A.D. 918, 83 N.Y.S.2d 465, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4042

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 8, 1948

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 274 A.D. 918 (Lier v. Bloomingdale Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lier v. Bloomingdale Bros., 274 A.D. 918, 83 N.Y.S.2d 465, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4042 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff failed to adduce any evidence whatever showing that the dog in question had previously manifested vicious propensities or that defendant had any actual or constructive notice thereof.

Accordingly, the judgment appealed from should be reversed and the complaint dismissed, with costs and disbursements to appellant.

Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Van Voorhis, JJ., concur.

Judgment unanimously reversed, with costs to the appellant, and the complaint dismissed. [See post, p. 1032.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI