Lienow v. Ellis

6 Mass. 331
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 15, 1810·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Parsons, C. J.

It is the opinipn of the Court that the exception urged by the counsel for the defendant must prevail. When the action of covenant is founded on privity of contract between the parties, their executors or administrators, it is transitory, and may be sued as a transitory action ; but when it is founded on privity of estate, the action is then local, and must be sued in the county where the land lies. In the case before us, if the plaintiff can maintain an action of covenant upon the covenant on which he declares, he must maintain it as assignee of Bartlet, by virtue of his conveyance of the land; and his privity is a privity of estate, and not of contract.

After this opinion was delivered, the plaintiff had leave to discontinue, upon payment of costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lienow v. Ellis, 6 Mass. 331 (Mass. 1810).

6 Mass. 331 (Lienow v. Ellis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Merrimack Valley National Bank
362 N.E.2d 939 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1977)
New York Central Railroad v. County of Hudson
189 A. 400 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1937)
Platner v. Vincent
202 P. 655 (California Supreme Court, 1921)
Keyes & Marshall Bros. Realty Co. v. Trustees of the Canton Christian College
146 A.D. 796 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)
Coleman v. Lucksinger
123 S.W. 441 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1909)
Teass v. City of St. Albans
19 L.R.A. 802 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1893)
Oliver v. Loye
59 Miss. 320 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1881)
Smith v. Larrabee
58 Me. 361 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1870)
Clark v. Scudder
72 Mass. 122 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1856)
White v. Sanborn
6 N.H. 220 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1833)